Hi Scott, your JSON Patch should still be inside the branch. Could you please double check?
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Scott Eade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Dezember 2008 06:00 > An: Turbine Developers List > Betreff: Re: Loaders, AssemblerFactories etc. > > Thomas Vandahl wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I'm currently trying to understand the structure of the Turbine > modules. > > As far as I understand, the way is as follows: > > > > - The loader checks for the module in its cache (if so configured) > > - If not found, the AssemblerBrokerService is consulted for an > instance > > of the module > > - This in turn requests a factory to generate the instance. > > > > In the middle of this process the TemplateService and a couple of > > mappers are involved. Some of them provide their own caching in > addition > > to the loaders. > > > > Could some kind soul of the senior developers please shed some light > on > > the reasons for this design. Something obvious I have missed? > > > Um, you are probably the person with the most knowledge of the inner > workings of Turbine that is active on this list. > > If there is consent, I'd propose to clean this up a bit and to let > the > > factories do all the work. Would that sound insane to anyone? > > > Consistency is good. I trust your judgement. > > I suggest that any further work we do be limited to the trunk and > fulcrum (though I will commit my JSON patch to the 2.3 branch). > > Scott > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
