Scott Eade wrote: >> Could some kind soul of the senior developers please shed some light on >> the reasons for this design. Something obvious I have missed? >> > Um, you are probably the person with the most knowledge of the inner > workings of Turbine that is active on this list.
Thank you for your confidence. If you agree I'll just use this thread to document my ideas and I hope I can be followed :-) Just veto as you see fit. I'll try to proceed carefully. I'd appreciate any comments. Now, first step. Currently, all the loaders have their own caching. I propose to shift the cache into the AssemblerBrokerService. That would mean a common cache for all types of modules, where the key would consist of the module type, a colon and the name of the module like in "action:LoginUser". All exception handling would be concentrated at one place and the loaders could go in the next step. Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
