On 07.04.11 12:27, Ludwig Magnusson wrote: > - 1 > * I have a lot of problems with my security model and generics since we use > our own implementations of User, Group, Role etc. Earlier this was not a > problem since it only caused an unchecked warning. I can take a look at this > and make the implementation of generics better.
What is wrong with the implementation? > * Sources are not attatched in the "right" way. I.e a jar-file. This is > easily fixed in the pom. Feel free to add it. > * A nice guide on configuring services is important. I'd very much like > something that looks like "this is how you used to configure your services, > this is how you do it now." Showing both configuration in the files and how > to access the services in java. Again, feel free to write one. Use the wiki to start with http://wiki.apache.org/turbine/Turbine4/Turbine4.0M1/Diff > And a general question: > In the fulcrum projects, the static acces classes for the services are gone. > Is this a conscious decision? > In our project, there are ca 50 references to these classes. AFAICT, this was intentional. Some of the services still have static accessors (now mostly called *Facade) or pull tools available in Turbine. Normally there is no static accessor in the library itself. Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
