Hi Siegfried,

On 10.04.11 23:23, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> +) when checking the signature I still get errors but maybe we get a
> third opinion?

To make sure nothing happened on the way to the web server, I downloaded
for example turbine-4.0-M1-binaries.tar.gz and
turbine-4.0-M1-binaries.tar.gz.asc from turbine.apache.org. The result is:

--8<--
gpg: ASCII-Hülle: Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
gpg: die unterzeichneten Daten sind wohl in 'turbine-4.0-M1-binaries.tar.gz'
gpg: Unterschrift vom Di  5 Apr 21:54:30 2011 CEST mittels DSA-Schlüssel
ID 88817402
gpg: verwende Vertrauensmodell PGP
gpg: Korrekte Unterschrift von "Thomas Vandahl <[email protected]>"
gpg:                     alias "Thomas Vandahl (Apache) <[email protected]>"
gpg:                     alias "Dr. Thomas Vandahl
<[email protected]>"
gpg: Binäre Unterschrift, Hashmethode "SHA1"
--8<--

Could you try a re-download?

* Anyone else cares to verify the signatures? *

I'm a bit concerned about this issue as I used the standard Maven-2
cycle to build, sign and deploy the files. It would be nasty if
something went wrong on this way.

Bye, Thomas.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to