Actually Thomas,

Georg has already released the new parent POM as Turbine-5 - I don't see
any reason to go back now :-) I say we just move forward and make more
exciting changes in Turbine 6.

Georg - I am working through your old notes to me on preparing
releases.    Looking at the dependency chain, I think we should actually
go with the following to start:

1. fulcrum-yaafi-crypto
2. fulcrum-yaafi (depends on 1)
3. fulcrum-testcontainer (depends on 2)
4. fulcrum-factory (depends on 2 and 3)

If you don't mind, I would like to attempt to prepare the release for
yaafi-crypto and work through the process.  Let me know what you think.

Thanks!
Jeff


On 11/5/18 2:53 PM, Jeffery Painter wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I don't care what the version number is as long as we can push out some
> of the work done so far :-)  I think we have made some notable
> improvements since the last release.
>
> Georg?
>
> -
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
> On 11/5/18 2:46 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
>> On 05.11.18 15:42, Jeffery Painter wrote:
>>> Hi Georg,
>>>
>>> I am ok if it is not too much effort. I would like to see us get
>>> Turbine-5.0 out as soon as we can as I am actively building against this
>>> code base, and I would prefer that the code I ship code to client isn't
>>> pointing at my local snapshot builds :-) 
>>>
>>> My dev instances have been running for over a month now and the code
>>> base seems very stable.
>> I'm a bit tight on cycle right now as you may have noticed. I actually
>> wanted to add some more "modern" stuff as for example WebSockets to
>> really justify a 5.0 release. I won't be able to help much in the near
>> future, though.
>>
>> Base line: What about 4.5?
>>
>> Bye, Thomas
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to