An update on 1.3 for those watching this thread:

- a release candidate is available for review at
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1a/ with comments to this
VOTE thread: http://apache.markmail.org/message/fmlak6bfhentybf7

- waiting for a final fix before making a new release candidate as discussed
in this thread: http://apache.markmail.org/message/tuomadm4b3kubgjn

   ...ant

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:29 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Quite a few updates to the 1.3 branch over night so it looks like we need a
> new RC1, here's what I think we should do:
>
> - I'm not sure if there are still things outstanding so I'll leave the 1.3
> branch open for updates till tomorrow
> - tomorrow I'll re tag and respin RC1 and call a vote on that
> - after then the 1.3 branch goes to RTC so updates to trunk and raise a
> JIRA against 1.3 if you want a change in 1.3
> - plan on likely needing an RC2 early next week to fix any issues found in
> RC1
>
> This should get a 1.3 out late next week. We can have a 1.3.1 in the near
> future to pick up things that miss 1.3. Does this sound ok to everyone to
> get what they need in 1.3 or 1.3.1?
>
> In the meantime the distros at
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/>are
>  still useful for reviewing if anyone has the time and inclination.
>
>    ...ant
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:15 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This is excellent help, thanks Yang.
>>
>> Note I've created a new RC1 distro which includes the correctly built jars
>> with out the shade plugin problem so that can be used to test the standalone
>> samples, see 
>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/>
>>
>> Will wait and see how things go today before deciding to call a vote on
>> that or spin a new RC before calling a vote - everyone, reviews of this RC
>> are welcome!
>>
>>    ...ant
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Sun Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Got it. I will retest them tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Yang Sun
>>>
>>> 2008/7/8 Feng Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> Hi,Sun
>>>>
>>>> On Websphere, you must set application properties to use the application
>>>> class loader before the parent container class loader.
>>>> There is an explanation on the Sebastien's blog.
>>>>
>>>> http://jsdelfino.blogspot.com/2007/10/how-to-use-apache-tuscany-with.html
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Feng Wang
>>>>
>>>> On 2008-07-08 15:32:55,Sun Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Hi, Simon:
>>>> >
>>>> >I did a test against Tomcat 5.5.26 and Websphere 6.1 with JDK 1.5 based
>>>> on
>>>> >your package.
>>>> >
>>>> >The webapps in samples directory all passed the tests in Tomcat
>>>> 5.5.26.
>>>> >
>>>> >While in Websphere 6.1, the result is not good.
>>>> >calculator-webapp         pass
>>>> >feed-aggregator-webapp pass
>>>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >calculator-ws-webapp failed
>>>> >helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp failed
>>>> >The log trace is attached. I am guessing some class confliction there.
>>>> >-------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >helloworld-dojo-webapp failed
>>>> >helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp failed
>>>> >No expected response. A screenshot for helloworld-dojo-webapp is
>>>> attached.
>>>> >
>>>> >Thanks,
>>>> >Yang Sun
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >2008/7/5 Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Sun Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Hi, Simon:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I am not sure whether it is a bit late. I can commit 1-2 hours/day
>>>> to help
>>>> >>> you do this testing (tomcat 5, websphere).
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> If you need my help, please reply me.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Regards,
>>>> >>> Yang Sun
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 2008/7/2 Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that
>>>> need
>>>> >>>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> The ones I see at the moment are...
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a
>>>> >>>> discussion thread on this (
>>>> >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00433.html)
>>>> so I
>>>> >>>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP.
>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I
>>>> don't
>>>> >>>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree
>>>> this is an
>>>> >>>> easy fix
>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 -
>>>> >>>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love
>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 -
>>>> demo/xml-bigbank
>>>> >>>> also needs attention
>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to
>>>> sort out
>>>> >>>> remaining references to incubator/ing
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Other things that need to be done.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for
>>>> Tomcat5,
>>>> >>>> Geronimo, WebSphere
>>>> >>>> Do the legal checking
>>>> >>>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm
>>>> waiting
>>>> >>>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the
>>>> sca pom.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> As before the release status summary is at
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week.
>>>> All help
>>>> >>>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about
>>>> already or
>>>> >>>> looking at RC0 which is here
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Thanks
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Simon
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >> Great, thanks for the offer Sun. Am just about to post about RC1. If
>>>> you
>>>> >> find any issues raise a JIRA against 1.3
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Thanks
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Simon
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to