I said I'd do an RC2 today but there are still some open JIRAs, the main ones being TUSCANY-2480, TUSCANY-2484, and TUSCANY-2486. Whats the status and ETA for fixes for these? Can i help with any of those, i've done work on the ?wsdl endpoints in the past so could help with TUSCANY-2480 if its needed?
...ant On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:02 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Following on from this there has been another problem found in 1.3 with the > new generated wsdl - http://apache.markmail.org/message/fryloi6byuyjqvrlfor > which I've raised TUSCANY-2480, could someone take a look at that as I'm > out the rest of the week otherwise i'll pick it up on Monday. > > What i think we should do is plan on having an RC2 next Tuesday which will > give time for the two problems to be fixed with the hope that that is the > final RC so we'd get the release officially out by the end of next week. For > that to work RC2 needs to be good, i'm a bit worried about that as there's > only been two people who have posted that they've reviewed RC1 so far. Be a > shame if we need an RC3 because of a problem that could have been found in > RC1 - if you have time please review: > http://apache.markmail.org/message/fmlak6bfhentybf7 > > ...ant > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:36 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> An update on 1.3 for those watching this thread: >> >> - a release candidate is available for review at >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1a/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1a/>with >> comments to this VOTE thread: >> http://apache.markmail.org/message/fmlak6bfhentybf7 >> >> - waiting for a final fix before making a new release candidate as >> discussed in this thread: >> http://apache.markmail.org/message/tuomadm4b3kubgjn >> >> ...ant >> >> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:29 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Quite a few updates to the 1.3 branch over night so it looks like we need >>> a new RC1, here's what I think we should do: >>> >>> - I'm not sure if there are still things outstanding so I'll leave the >>> 1.3 branch open for updates till tomorrow >>> - tomorrow I'll re tag and respin RC1 and call a vote on that >>> - after then the 1.3 branch goes to RTC so updates to trunk and raise a >>> JIRA against 1.3 if you want a change in 1.3 >>> - plan on likely needing an RC2 early next week to fix any issues found >>> in RC1 >>> >>> This should get a 1.3 out late next week. We can have a 1.3.1 in the near >>> future to pick up things that miss 1.3. Does this sound ok to everyone to >>> get what they need in 1.3 or 1.3.1? >>> >>> In the meantime the distros at >>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/>are >>> still useful for reviewing if anyone has the time and inclination. >>> >>> ...ant >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:15 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> This is excellent help, thanks Yang. >>>> >>>> Note I've created a new RC1 distro which includes the correctly built >>>> jars with out the shade plugin problem so that can be used to test the >>>> standalone samples, see >>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/> >>>> >>>> Will wait and see how things go today before deciding to call a vote on >>>> that or spin a new RC before calling a vote - everyone, reviews of this RC >>>> are welcome! >>>> >>>> ...ant >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Sun Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Got it. I will retest them tomorrow. >>>>> >>>>> Best Regards, >>>>> Yang Sun >>>>> >>>>> 2008/7/8 Feng Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>> >>>>> Hi,Sun >>>>>> >>>>>> On Websphere, you must set application properties to use the >>>>>> application class loader before the parent container class loader. >>>>>> There is an explanation on the Sebastien's blog. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://jsdelfino.blogspot.com/2007/10/how-to-use-apache-tuscany-with.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Feng Wang >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2008-07-08 15:32:55,Sun Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >Hi, Simon: >>>>>> > >>>>>> >I did a test against Tomcat 5.5.26 and Websphere 6.1 with JDK 1.5 >>>>>> based on >>>>>> >your package. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >The webapps in samples directory all passed the tests in Tomcat >>>>>> 5.5.26. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >While in Websphere 6.1, the result is not good. >>>>>> >calculator-webapp pass >>>>>> >feed-aggregator-webapp pass >>>>>> >------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >calculator-ws-webapp failed >>>>>> >helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp failed >>>>>> >The log trace is attached. I am guessing some class confliction >>>>>> there. >>>>>> >------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >helloworld-dojo-webapp failed >>>>>> >helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp failed >>>>>> >No expected response. A screenshot for helloworld-dojo-webapp is >>>>>> attached. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >Thanks, >>>>>> >Yang Sun >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >2008/7/5 Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Sun Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>> Hi, Simon: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> I am not sure whether it is a bit late. I can commit 1-2 hours/day >>>>>> to help >>>>>> >>> you do this testing (tomcat 5, websphere). >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> If you need my help, please reply me. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Regards, >>>>>> >>> Yang Sun >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> 2008/7/2 Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that >>>>>> need >>>>>> >>>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> The ones I see at the moment are... >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a >>>>>> >>>> discussion thread on this ( >>>>>> >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00433.html) >>>>>> so I >>>>>> >>>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP. >>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally >>>>>> I don't >>>>>> >>>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree >>>>>> this is an >>>>>> >>>> easy fix >>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 - >>>>>> >>>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love >>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 - >>>>>> demo/xml-bigbank >>>>>> >>>> also needs attention >>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to >>>>>> sort out >>>>>> >>>> remaining references to incubator/ing >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> Other things that need to be done. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for >>>>>> Tomcat5, >>>>>> >>>> Geronimo, WebSphere >>>>>> >>>> Do the legal checking >>>>>> >>>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm >>>>>> waiting >>>>>> >>>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the >>>>>> sca pom. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> As before the release status summary is at >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week. >>>>>> All help >>>>>> >>>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about >>>>>> already or >>>>>> >>>> looking at RC0 which is here >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/> >>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> Simon >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >> Great, thanks for the offer Sun. Am just about to post about RC1. >>>>>> If you >>>>>> >> find any issues raise a JIRA against 1.3 >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Thanks >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Simon >>>>>> >> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
