On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Ramkumar R <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.4 release are now >>>> available, please review and vote to release. >>>> >>>> The artifacts are available for at: >>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~ramkumar/tuscany/1.4RC2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eramkumar/tuscany/1.4RC2/> >>>> >>>> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging >>>> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT report. >>>> >>>> The SVN tag for the release is: >>>> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.2-RC2/> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.4RC2/ >>>> >>>> Here's my +1 to release. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks & Regards, >>>> Ramkumar Ramalingam >>>> >>> >>> Hi Ram >>> >>> I started taking a look over the weekend. Haven't got through testing >>> samples yet but an initial observation on size >>> >>> binary distro is 103M in 1.4, was 64M in 1.3.2 >>> >>> Tutorial store-test >>> Ships with a jar that has a java core in it. >>> >>> Should we ship tutorials with target dirs? I think we should remove and >>> have people build them. >>> The catalog-webapp has a full set of libs and is 8M >>> >>> demo/bigbank-* >>> now has target dirs where there were no target dirs in 1.3.2 >>> interestingly other demos are missing target dirs which were present in >>> 1.3.2 >>> I don't think we need target dirs in demos >>> >>> Also interestingly lib/jaxb-api-2.1.jar >>> >>> 89K in 1.3.2 >>> 104K in 1.4 >>> >>> + License file >>> + ContextFined$2.class >>> >>> Must have been updated on the maven repos. Doesn't seem to be any impact. >>> >>> >>> Also I think we need to make a few more changes around the contribution >>> xsd. I'll check in another change shortly. >>> >>> I'll also take a look at samples etc. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Simon >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Next couple of thoughts... >> >> We don't need to ship the "etc" dir in the src distro >> >> Bin RAT file needs to be run on a clean checkout as it has picked up a >> load of DOJO files >> >> Simon >> > > > The file lib/bcel-5.2.jar is not mentioned in the LICENSE file. > > > Simon > I removed bcel from the LICENSE file in r724664 as it wasn't in the 1.4 distribution I'd built. Whats a bit strange is that it still isn't in the distribution when i build it now after a fresh update of the 1.4 svn branch. Can anyone see what dependency its coming from? ...ant
