On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:39 AM, kelvin goodson <kelvingood...@gmail.com> wrote: > My understanding is that there are two distinct sets of classes in the > SPIs, those that are designed for specialisation by the extension > provider and those that are designed to have their methods invoked by > extension provider code calls. I believe that these sets are truly > distinct, i.e. the intersect of these sets is the empty set. It > feels like a useful piece of information to give the extension > programmer. Do you think that there are hybrid classes that make the > intersect non-empty? > > Kelvin. >
I'm not sure I see the need, I guess if its useful for what you're doing right now then it doesn't matter but if the intention is to make using these required then I'd want more justification first. ...ant
