On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:34 PM, ant elder <antel...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, if there was a mainly flat structure what are your thoughts on
>> then having at least one folder named something like "getting started"
>> that groups some introductory samples to show new users how to get
>> going with Tuscany so they aren't just confronted with a single folder
>> with dozens of samples and not knowing where to begin?
>>
>>    ...ant
>>
>
> But then, we have the "Store getting started guide" on the website,
> and currently store is listed at applications... but your suggestion
> looks better, the less sub-folders the better, at least to my personal
> preference

Would a different name then alleviate the store guide issue - "first
steps", "introduction", "Look here first" ...?

> preference which you guys shouldn't care much for this sample
> structure issue (at least for now) :).

It would be good for users and the devs making these changes if we
could agree a structure everyone can live with now and then not have
to keep fiddling with it. Users aren't going to want samples moving
around over releases, and it takes quite a bit of work moving to get
the svn history, doc, build and release process all updated and
working correctly so if the "(at least for now)" comment means you
have something you're saving for later then now might be a better time
to comment.

   ...ant

Reply via email to