On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've been trying to help a user get going with one of the samples > using the latest code but its ended up needing a bunch of change to > the sample pom.xml's to get it to work with the latest snapshot code. > One of the issues is if you checkout a sample like > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/getting-started/helloworld/ > and try to build it that doesn't work unless you've built trunk > locally.
So, wouldn't this be a similar issue if you get a released version of the helloworld with a released version of tuscany compared to the most recent snapshots ? > But thats just one of the reasons, its been ages since we did > a trunk release and there are lots of good changes in there. Last time > we talked about this I couldn't find three people who said they'd vote > for a release, If i just cut an RC of what the trunk builds now i > expect there are a lot of broken samples missing doc and and incorrect > readme's so whats the minimum we could do to fix that which would get > three +1s? If i just did a trunk source release + maven module release > but no binary distro would anyone vote for that? Or if i stripped out > all the samples or maybe except for one or two samples which really > worked and had good READMEs would you vote for that? Or what else > would it take? > > ...ant > What would be the "version name" for the release ? I think we should do a regular milestone/beta release and I'd be ok if some samples might be broken, but I wouldn't like to see source only distros, as that would kind require the users to have to build anyway, unless they are using maven which it's not really a requirement we have imposed into users before. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
