On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM, ant elder <antel...@apache.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I've been trying to help a user get going with one of the samples >>>> using the latest code but its ended up needing a bunch of change to >>>> the sample pom.xml's to get it to work with the latest snapshot code. >>>> One of the issues is if you checkout a sample like >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/getting-started/helloworld/ >>>> and try to build it that doesn't work unless you've built trunk >>>> locally. >>> >>> So, wouldn't this be a similar issue if you get a released version of >>> the helloworld with a released version of tuscany compared to the most >>> recent snapshots ? >>> >>>> But thats just one of the reasons, its been ages since we did >>>> a trunk release and there are lots of good changes in there. Last time >>>> we talked about this I couldn't find three people who said they'd vote >>>> for a release, If i just cut an RC of what the trunk builds now i >>>> expect there are a lot of broken samples missing doc and and incorrect >>>> readme's so whats the minimum we could do to fix that which would get >>>> three +1s? If i just did a trunk source release + maven module release >>>> but no binary distro would anyone vote for that? Or if i stripped out >>>> all the samples or maybe except for one or two samples which really >>>> worked and had good READMEs would you vote for that? Or what else >>>> would it take? >>>> >>>> ...ant >>>> >>> >>> What would be the "version name" for the release ? I think we should >>> do a regular milestone/beta release and I'd be ok if some samples >>> might be broken, but I wouldn't like to see source only distros, as >>> that would kind require the users to have to build anyway, unless they >>> are using maven which it's not really a requirement we have imposed >>> into users before. >>> >> >> Ok thats sounding more promising, i don't mind not doing a source only >> release i just want _a_ release with the module jars in maven central, >> i don't mind what its called 2.0-Beta3 or M6 or something else. So how >> about if its called 2.0-Beta3 and based off the current trunk so the >> samples and distro are as they are. I'll try and clean up some >> helloworld samples but i wont have the time to make all of the samples >> perfect. >> >> ...ant >> > > What's the timeframe you are looking for ? I could look at some > samples and other minor cleanups over the weekend. > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
I can try and take a look through the samples over the next couple of days and do some tidying. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
