2011/8/3 Scott Kurz <sku...@gmail.com>: > Thanks for finding that Simon. I think when I last came across that I > parsed it as assuming a local, PBR interface. > But...I don't have any support for that and the surrounding text > specifically mentions serialization, so I think you've captured the intent. > > Well, it still seems ugly to me... if something in our Tuscany impl changes, > then your WSDL-mapped interface is now different? It seems like we're > talking about a class of service: remotable in the sense of cross-JVM, but > never invocable outside of the Tuscany runtime, not very SOA-ish. I'm not > saying it's useless... it's just kind of a new concept thrown in from my > perspective. An other naive way is using the MTOM support and serialize in Java. However if you want something really SOAish, forget about Java serialization.What about if you have a C#/Python client? Using for example Apache Thrift will provide better interoperability if you want binary serialization.
-- Quiero ser el rayo de sol que cada día te despierta para hacerte respirar y vivir en me. "Favola -Moda".
