[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13138383#comment-13138383
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3965:
-------------------------------------
The discussion on the ML
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tuscany-dev/201108.mbox/%3c4e53d96a.5040...@gmail.com%3e)
tailed off a while back and the majority view seems to be that we should
ignore any properties on a super class on the basis that the implementation
class should be in control. I'll do the changes to make this so.
> In a Service Implementation annotated with @Service, it's unannonated
> properties should not be introspected
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-3965
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3965
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java SCA Assembly Model
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta1
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Hasan Muhammad
> Assignee: Simon Laws
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: Java-SCA-2.x
>
>
> I was trying to deploy a composite which has component implementing a java
> implementation annotated with @Service which has the following field
> @Service(TestOasis.class)
> public class TestOasisImpl implements TestOasis {
> @DefaultHelperContext
> protected HelperContext helperContext;
> This is not a property as it clearly does not have a @Property annotation and
> hence the composite definition does not define this property. However, the
> validation is logging this as an error as follows
> [Composite: {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/opencsa/sca/200912}, Component:
> SDOSimpleServiceJavaSerOasis] - No type specified on component property:
> Component = SDOSimpleServiceJavaSerOasis Property = helperContext
> This is coming from org.apache.tuscany.sca.builder.impl.ComponentBuilderImpl
> and the message ID is NoTypeForComponentProperty
> This validation is too strict and we should ignore properties defined in
> Service class which are not annotated with @Property. The CI spec section 8.1
> appears to confirm to this deduction.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
