I would like to forward such a request.   Is OOoforums/Calc:
http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewforum.phtml?f=3

the appropriate place,  or this list?

- joachim

On 5/31/07, Juergen Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

ah yes, i forgot it. From my perspective it is a useless feature to call
the function again and again to prepare this little preview of the
result in the function wizard dialog. Anyway you can submit an request
for enhancement (for the calc appl) if you like. I would like to have it
configurable.

Juergen

Joachim Dahl wrote:
> The problem seems to be that the add-in is executed every time I click
on a
> parameter in the
> function-wizard,  and thus the optimization routines I am wrapping are
> executed over and over again
> as I cycle through the different parameters.   So it's not a bug, but
> something you want to keep in mind for larger problems that take several
> minutes or longer to finish.
>
> - joachim
>
>
> On 5/29/07, Juergen Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joachim,
>>
>> that of course sounds strange and we should analyze it in detail. I am
>> not really familiar with the Python binding but anyway we should try to
>> check it. Maybe you can prepare a small demo add-in and can provide it
>> for further investigation.
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>> Joachim Dahl wrote:
>> > I have a final question that I'd like to ask you...
>> >
>> > I developed and tested the add-in on Ubuntu Feisty that comes with
OOo
>> > 2.2.0.
>> > The add-in
>> > seems to work perfectly,   but the function wizard is incredibly
>> sluggish
>> > for my add-in (and not for the
>> > regular OOo add-in)...   For example,  when I select a parameter in
the
>> > add-in, CPU usage goes
>> > to 100% and it takes 5-10s before the new parameter and the
>> corresponding
>> > cell ranges are
>> > highlighted - and the examples are all very small.   But if I update
>> the
>> > add-in parameters
>> > directly without the function wizard it works fast and smoothly,  so
>> it's
>> > not just simply Python
>> > being slow.
>> >
>> > Can anyone think of a potential error in the add-in that would cause
>> this?
>> > If I can solve this problem
>> > also,  I will be happy to the add a small Python example to the wiki
in
>> > return for all your help...
>> >
>> > thanks
>> > Joachim
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to