how about addons-osgi-runtime ? -Marshall
On 1/27/2011 9:58 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > Hi Marshall, > no problem for me, you can certainly do it; I was just wondering which name > could be the best to change the sandbox-osgi-runtime to, so I waited for > some feedback first ;-) Do you have any preference? > Cheers, > Tommaso > > 2011/1/27 Marshall Schor <[email protected]> > >> Tommaso - Can I do this naming change, or do you want to handle it? >> -Marshall >> >> On 1/25/2011 5:16 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: >>> 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <[email protected]> >>> >>>> On 1/25/2011 3:44 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: >>>>> Hi Marshall, >>>>> the name Solrcas-osgi is due to what we decided some times ago about >>>> being >>>>> aligned with Felix Commons practices which specify that the OSGi >> artifact >>>>> (created with Maven Felix Plugin) of a non OSGi artifact should be >> called >>>>> $ARTIFACTID-osgi so I maintained that convention. >>>> Ok, sounds right. >>>> >>>> I think we need to do a change to follow the convention where the >>>> containing >>>> folder name >>>> (in SVN and in the checked-out working copy) is the same as the artifact >>>> name; >>>> this is needed to make m2eclipse work, I think. >>>> It also prevents confusion - as there is already a folder called, e.g., >>>> Lucas, >>>> and it's confusing to have another folder, also called Lucas, under the >>>> sandbox-osgi-runtime, which has a different (but related) pom. >>>> >>>> We would also to change the <modules> content in sandbox-osgi-runtime, >> to >>>> use >>>> those names (which will now match the artifact names). >>>> >>>> So for example: >>>> >>>> This would change the following: >>>> >>>> <modules> >>>> <module>opencalais</module> to .. OpenCalaisAnnotator-osgi >>>> <module>alchemyapi</module> to ... alchemy-annotator-osgi >>>> ... >>>> <module>solrcas</module> to ... Solrcas-osgi >>>> </modules> >>>> >>>> Does this sound right? Or have I missed something? >>>> >>> Yep Marshall that sounds good :) >>> Tommaso >>> >>> >>>> -Marshall >>>> >>>>> Regarding the name I agree that we should drop the 'sandbox' part, >> maybe >>>>> replacing it with something like addons/annotators/component . >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Tommaso >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Tommaso, >>>>>> >>>>>> I think there's a spelling error - a discrepancy in capitalization >>>> between >>>>>> sandbox-osgi-runtime <modules> where it calls out solrcas, but the pom >>>>>> names the >>>>>> artifact Solrcas (capital first letter). Which way should it be? >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, I'm wondering about using the word "sandbox" in >>>>>> "sandbox-osgi-runtime". >>>>>> Can we have a name which is more indicative of what this grouping is >>>>>> intended >>>>>> for, and maybe drop the sandbox part of the name? (I'm thinking that >> at >>>>>> some >>>>>> point in the future, sandbox projects may become more regular >>>> projects...) >>>>>> -Marshall >>>>>>
