That's right for me :-) I'm going to apply such a change and also align the directory names of the modules to the related artifactIds. Tommaso
2011/1/27 Marshall Schor <[email protected]> > how about addons-osgi-runtime ? > > -Marshall > > On 1/27/2011 9:58 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > > Hi Marshall, > > no problem for me, you can certainly do it; I was just wondering which > name > > could be the best to change the sandbox-osgi-runtime to, so I waited for > > some feedback first ;-) Do you have any preference? > > Cheers, > > Tommaso > > > > 2011/1/27 Marshall Schor <[email protected]> > > > >> Tommaso - Can I do this naming change, or do you want to handle it? > >> -Marshall > >> > >> On 1/25/2011 5:16 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > >>> 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <[email protected]> > >>> > >>>> On 1/25/2011 3:44 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > >>>>> Hi Marshall, > >>>>> the name Solrcas-osgi is due to what we decided some times ago about > >>>> being > >>>>> aligned with Felix Commons practices which specify that the OSGi > >> artifact > >>>>> (created with Maven Felix Plugin) of a non OSGi artifact should be > >> called > >>>>> $ARTIFACTID-osgi so I maintained that convention. > >>>> Ok, sounds right. > >>>> > >>>> I think we need to do a change to follow the convention where the > >>>> containing > >>>> folder name > >>>> (in SVN and in the checked-out working copy) is the same as the > artifact > >>>> name; > >>>> this is needed to make m2eclipse work, I think. > >>>> It also prevents confusion - as there is already a folder called, > e.g., > >>>> Lucas, > >>>> and it's confusing to have another folder, also called Lucas, under > the > >>>> sandbox-osgi-runtime, which has a different (but related) pom. > >>>> > >>>> We would also to change the <modules> content in sandbox-osgi-runtime, > >> to > >>>> use > >>>> those names (which will now match the artifact names). > >>>> > >>>> So for example: > >>>> > >>>> This would change the following: > >>>> > >>>> <modules> > >>>> <module>opencalais</module> to .. OpenCalaisAnnotator-osgi > >>>> <module>alchemyapi</module> to ... alchemy-annotator-osgi > >>>> ... > >>>> <module>solrcas</module> to ... Solrcas-osgi > >>>> </modules> > >>>> > >>>> Does this sound right? Or have I missed something? > >>>> > >>> Yep Marshall that sounds good :) > >>> Tommaso > >>> > >>> > >>>> -Marshall > >>>> > >>>>> Regarding the name I agree that we should drop the 'sandbox' part, > >> maybe > >>>>> replacing it with something like addons/annotators/component . > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Tommaso > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <[email protected]> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Tommaso, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think there's a spelling error - a discrepancy in capitalization > >>>> between > >>>>>> sandbox-osgi-runtime <modules> where it calls out solrcas, but the > pom > >>>>>> names the > >>>>>> artifact Solrcas (capital first letter). Which way should it be? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Also, I'm wondering about using the word "sandbox" in > >>>>>> "sandbox-osgi-runtime". > >>>>>> Can we have a name which is more indicative of what this grouping is > >>>>>> intended > >>>>>> for, and maybe drop the sandbox part of the name? (I'm thinking > that > >> at > >>>>>> some > >>>>>> point in the future, sandbox projects may become more regular > >>>> projects...) > >>>>>> -Marshall > >>>>>> >
