[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13878603#comment-13878603
]
Richard Eckart de Castilho edited comment on UIMA-3575 at 1/22/14 12:43 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think we can do this. But I am very curious: why would you want to package
the parent-pom at all? This is largely a build artifact. I wonder, how would
that contribute to a packaged version of UIMA?
was (Author: rec):
I think we can do this. But I am very curious: why would you want to package
the parent-pom at all? This is largely a build artifact. I wonder, would how
that contribute to a packaged version of UIMA?
> parent-pom don't include the license file
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-3575
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3575
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Environment: Fedora all
> Reporter: gil cattaneo
>
> Not available LICENSE file in source directory structure
> Please. Added license and copyright notice.
> the fedora pakaging guideline is very strictly precise about this problem
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
> thanks
> regards
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
