[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13878640#comment-13878640
]
Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-3575:
--------------------------------------------------
I did a quick check of our release binary and source release archives for
uimaj-addons (version 2.3.1) and uimaj (version 2.5.0)
I can see that the source release for the uimaj-addons contains the parent-pom
file, but it also contains a LICENSE file at the root of the extracted source
archive. .
The uimaj source release does not seem to contain this file, but it also
contains a LICENSE file at the root of the extracted source archive.
The binary releases do not appear to contain this file.
The uimaj binary release contains a LICENSE file at the root of the extracted
folder.
The uimaj-addons binary release is a bit odd in the way that it contains an
additional "addons" folder, but within that, there is also a LICENSE file.
Can you be more specific as to what place exactly you refer to by "in source
directory structure"?
> parent-pom don't include the license file
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-3575
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3575
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Environment: Fedora all
> Reporter: gil cattaneo
>
> Not available LICENSE file in source directory structure
> Please. Added license and copyright notice.
> the fedora pakaging guideline is very strictly precise about this problem
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
> thanks
> regards
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
