[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13878675#comment-13878675
]
Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-3575:
--------------------------------------------------
I should also point out that I believe the source you are using is not a
canonical source:
https://github.com/apache/uima-build/releases
As far as I know, the releases listed there are automatically created by GitHub
based on information contained in the commit history. In that case, they are
not official release artifacts. The Apache UIMA team actually does not maintain
their source code in this repository. It is a clone of our subversion
repository.
Our official releases are available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/uima/
> parent-pom don't include the license file
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-3575
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3575
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Build, Packaging and Test
> Affects Versions: parent-pom-8
> Environment: Fedora all
> Reporter: gil cattaneo
> Fix For: parent-pom-9
>
>
> Not available LICENSE file in source directory structure
> Please. Added license and copyright notice.
> the fedora pakaging guideline is very strictly precise about this problem
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
> thanks
> regards
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
