Built from source (SVN tag) on Java 8 with clean repo: OK Compare source ZIP against SVN tag: OK - Btw, it seems that there are generated files in the SVN. What I did: - check out SVN - built it - mvn clean - compare with zip - now I had many differences for MANIFEST.MF files -> should these MANIFEST.MF files really be in Svn? - they look generated.
Signature spot check: OK License spot check: OK Installing from update site into Eclipse Mars: technically OK - Why does the update site show up as "file:/D:/work/ruta/..." in Eclipse? Potential problem: The license text displayed during install in Eclipse does not seem to aggregate over all the license texts of the individual LICENSE.txt files contained in the UIMA Ruta distribution. Cheers, -- Richard On 17.08.2015, at 14:58, Peter Klügl <peter.klu...@averbis.com> wrote: > Hi, > > the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.3.1 is ready for voting. > > This is a bugfix release which mainly fixes problems of the rule > inference and the new maven plugin. > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1071/ > > SVN tag: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.3.1 > > Update site: > http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta > > Archive with all sources: > http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.1-rc1/ruta-2.3.1-source-release.zip > > Overall 32 issues have been fixed for this release (2 of them are marked > as duplicate/not a problem). > They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html. > > ... and here: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.3.1ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC > > Please vote on release: > > [ ] +1 OK to release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ... > > Thanks. > > Peter
