Ok, then I'd +1 the release as well. Cheers,
-- Richard On 25.08.2015, at 11:41, Richard Eckart de Castilho <r...@apache.org> wrote: > Built from source (SVN tag) on Java 8 with clean repo: OK > > Compare source ZIP against SVN tag: OK > - Btw, it seems that there are generated files in the SVN. What I did: > - check out SVN > - built it > - mvn clean > - compare with zip > - now I had many differences for MANIFEST.MF files > -> should these MANIFEST.MF files really be in Svn? - they look generated. > > Signature spot check: OK > > License spot check: OK > > Installing from update site into Eclipse Mars: technically OK > - Why does the update site show up as "file:/D:/work/ruta/..." in Eclipse? > > > Potential problem: The license text displayed during install in Eclipse does > not seem to aggregate over all the license texts of the individual > LICENSE.txt files contained in the UIMA Ruta distribution. > > Cheers, > > -- Richard > > On 17.08.2015, at 14:58, Peter Klügl <peter.klu...@averbis.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.3.1 is ready for voting. >> >> This is a bugfix release which mainly fixes problems of the rule >> inference and the new maven plugin. >> >> Staging repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1071/ >> >> SVN tag: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.3.1 >> >> Update site: >> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta >> >> Archive with all sources: >> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.3.1-rc1/ruta-2.3.1-source-release.zip >> >> Overall 32 issues have been fixed for this release (2 of them are marked >> as duplicate/not a problem). >> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html. >> >> ... and here: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.3.1ruta%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC >> >> Please vote on release: >> >> [ ] +1 OK to release >> [ ] 0 Don't care >> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ... >> >> Thanks. >> >> Peter >
