Peter, I build update site using -Papache-release profile on linux. So having the path as file:/D:/work/... in artifacts.xml suggests that it comes from some static file. I have no idea where from this originates from. Not clear to me what creates artifact.xml. Jerry
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Peter Klügl <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the paths are coming from [1] which is used during the > -Papache-release build. > If the update site is build locally without profile, an absolute path of > local workspace is set. > I haven't found the option yet to set the name in the maven build... > > Best, > > Peter > > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/uima/eclipse-update-site > > Am 10.02.2016 um 12:16 schrieb Peter Klügl: > > Hi, > > > > Am 09.02.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Marshall Schor: > >> ============================== > >> The artifacts.xml and content.xml for the update site both have wrong > data for > >> the repository name. The xml says: > >> <repository > >> > name='file:/D:/work/workspace-textmarker-uima/uima-as-eclipse-update-site/target/eclipse-update-site/ > >> - artifacts' > type='org.eclipse.equinox.p2.artifact.repository.simpleRepository' > >> version='1.0.0'> > >> > >> This looks like very old copy/paste error - because of the use of the > word > >> "textmarker-uima"... > > The name is wrong for all our update sites. I just checked the uimaj and > > ruta. The uimaj update site also mentions an really old textmarker > > worspace I used several years ago. The ruta update site mentioned also > > an outdated folder of an old machine. Only the names in the xmls of the > > composite site are correct. > > > > Best, > > > > Peter > >
