Hi,
yes, the static file is located in dist/release/uima:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/uima/eclipse-update-site
I do not recall the complete build process without looking at the ant
task, but I think that the file there is reused/modified when the
profile is used, else a new one is created.
I actually wonder why I created the initial file for uima-as...
Best,
Peter
Am 26.02.2016 um 21:50 schrieb Jaroslaw Cwiklik:
Peter, I build update site using -Papache-release profile on linux. So
having the path as file:/D:/work/... in artifacts.xml suggests that it
comes from some static file. I have no idea where from this originates
from. Not clear to me what creates artifact.xml.
Jerry
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Peter Klügl <[email protected]>
wrote:
I think the paths are coming from [1] which is used during the
-Papache-release build.
If the update site is build locally without profile, an absolute path of
local workspace is set.
I haven't found the option yet to set the name in the maven build...
Best,
Peter
[1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/uima/eclipse-update-site
Am 10.02.2016 um 12:16 schrieb Peter Klügl:
Hi,
Am 09.02.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Marshall Schor:
==============================
The artifacts.xml and content.xml for the update site both have wrong
data for
the repository name. The xml says:
<repository
name='file:/D:/work/workspace-textmarker-uima/uima-as-eclipse-update-site/target/eclipse-update-site/
- artifacts'
type='org.eclipse.equinox.p2.artifact.repository.simpleRepository'
version='1.0.0'>
This looks like very old copy/paste error - because of the use of the
word
"textmarker-uima"...
The name is wrong for all our update sites. I just checked the uimaj and
ruta. The uimaj update site also mentions an really old textmarker
worspace I used several years ago. The ruta update site mentioned also
an outdated folder of an old machine. Only the names in the xmls of the
composite site are correct.
Best,
Peter
