On 18.07.2016, at 14:14, Peter Klügl <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would prefer the .Xcas variants. Why distinguish between serialized > and binary?
We don't necessarily have to distinguish. But we may want to because "normal" UIMA binary formats identify themselves as such, but the serialized CAS afaik doesn't. > This is rather a convention concerning the CasIOUtils, right? The code > works right now with any file extension (exception: xcas). The output is > specified by the given outputstream. > > Well, for the CAS Editor, I could really use that convention in order to > link the editor. I was thinking about the CAS Editor (because I saw extensions being used there when I checked the code. But simply also in general as a best practice. Cheers, -- Richard
