While beginning to check in the Pear support implementation for V3, I saw
several incomplete parts in the implementation, and am working on those, so it
might be a few days...

-Marshall

On 8/17/2016 9:31 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> oops, sorry, have the last round of changes not checked in.
>
> the "id()" method of FeatureStructure ( a new method in V3) was renamed to
> "_id()" to avoid clashing with any user-defined method name.  (The leading "_"
> convention doesn't guarantee anything, but lessens the likelyhood of a 
> conflict).
>
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 8/15/2016 8:35 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> should uimaj-core compile right now? I get things like:
>>
>> uimaj-core/src/main/java/org/apache/uima/cas/impl/CASImpl.java:[3746,22]
>> cannot find symbol
>>   symbol:   method id()
>>   location: interface org.apache.uima.cas.FeatureStructure
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 03.08.2016 um 22:15 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>> The answer depends on whether or not you make use of "JCas".
>>>
>>> Existing JCas classes need to be either converted or regenerated from the
>>> descriptors.
>>>
>>> The code for regenerating is in the uimaj-tools project.
>>>
>>> The code for converting existing is in the uimaj-v3migration-jcas project.  
>>> The
>>> conversion scans a tree in the file system looking for things that look 
>>> like V2
>>> JCas classes (source or compiled classes), and "converts" these to v3, and
>>> reports on the conversion. 
>>>
>>> Other than those, you should only need uimaj-core.
>>>
>>>
>>> I've just got the basic PEAR support starting to work, but haven't checked 
>>> in
>>> those changes, but if you're not using Pears, you might be able to get this 
>>> to
>>> work :-) as of now.
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/3/2016 3:03 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I promised  some time ago to test the experimental branch against the
>>>> ruta implementation. Maven complains about some missing artifact
>>>> uimaj-jcas. Which modules do I need? Just uimaj-core?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply via email to