But I'd be all in favor of reducing the number of versions on the primary downloads page, i.e. to the latest versions of the respective packages (UIMAJ, UIMA-AS, uimaFIT, Ruta etc.).
I understand that there is interest in keeping links to a few older versions on the primary page because not all packages are compatible with each other in their latest version... but maybe this can be solved in a more "local" fashion e.g. providing a link to the UIMAJ 2.6.0 next to the UIMACPP version only... Do we really need to have like 4 versions of UIMAJ alone there? Also: are you still interested in distributing artifacts through Bintray? Cheers, -- Richard > On 30.08.2016, at 20:35, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > > hmmm, good point. > > The one thing that might be saved: checking out the uima-website (which gives > you a working copy of everything, unless you dig thru the manual and figure > out > how to limit things...) > > -Marshall > > > On 8/30/2016 2:18 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: >> Hi, >> >> hm, unlink them from the overview but still keep them around? It's not like >> we are going to save any kind of space by deleting anything. >> >> -- Richard >> >>> On 30.08.2016, at 18:00, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> the uima website has old versions of javadocs etc. for uima, and I plan to >>> soon >>> delete these (unless someone replies): >>> >>> uimaj-2.4.0 >>> uimaj-2.4.2 >>> uimaj-2.5.0 >>> >>> keeping: >>> uimaj-2.6.0 >>> uimaj-2.7.0 >>> uimaj-2.8.1 >>> uimaj-2.9.0 (also uimaj-current) >>> >>> -Marshall
