re: reducing number of versions on the primary downloads page - good suggestion, now done.
re: Bintray - I'm currently +0 (busy working on other priorities, and perhaps our other statistics can fill in...) -Marshall On 8/30/2016 2:56 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > But I'd be all in favor of reducing the number of versions on the primary > downloads page, i.e. to the latest versions of the respective packages > (UIMAJ, UIMA-AS, uimaFIT, Ruta etc.). > > I understand that there is interest in keeping links to a few older versions > on the primary page because not all packages are compatible with each other > in their latest version... but maybe this can be solved in a more "local" > fashion e.g. providing a link to the UIMAJ 2.6.0 next to the UIMACPP version > only... > > Do we really need to have like 4 versions of UIMAJ alone there? > > Also: are you still interested in distributing artifacts through Bintray? > > Cheers, > > -- Richard > >> On 30.08.2016, at 20:35, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> hmmm, good point. >> >> The one thing that might be saved: checking out the uima-website (which gives >> you a working copy of everything, unless you dig thru the manual and figure >> out >> how to limit things...) >> >> -Marshall >> >> >> On 8/30/2016 2:18 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> hm, unlink them from the overview but still keep them around? It's not like >>> we are going to save any kind of space by deleting anything. >>> >>> -- Richard >>> >>>> On 30.08.2016, at 18:00, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> the uima website has old versions of javadocs etc. for uima, and I plan to >>>> soon >>>> delete these (unless someone replies): >>>> >>>> uimaj-2.4.0 >>>> uimaj-2.4.2 >>>> uimaj-2.5.0 >>>> >>>> keeping: >>>> uimaj-2.6.0 >>>> uimaj-2.7.0 >>>> uimaj-2.8.1 >>>> uimaj-2.9.0 (also uimaj-current) >>>> >>>> -Marshall >
