+1 from me to continue ... -Marshall
On 1/22/2019 12:22 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for the pointer Marshall - no idea why I missed this... > > I have replaced the artifacts at > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimafit/3.0.0-rc1/ > > with the ones from target/checkout/target (no re-running of the build) > and they do contain a good issues file. > > I wouldn't call it a new RC because there was no new build, I just uploaded > the wrong files and this is now corrected. > > So is it ok to continue with this vote thread? > > -- Richard > >> On 21. Jan 2019, at 16:32, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> In "SVN", the release:perform step checks out the proposed "tag" and redoes >> the >> entire "build" using that. The artifacts that are deployed to the staging >> repo >> (repository.apache.org) are from that checkout. >> >> (I think the "GitHub" version works the same way?) >> >> The artifacts that are are supposed to be the RC should also come from that >> checkout/build. >> >> I'm guessing that the RC files are incorrectly being taken from the wrong >> spot? >> >> If so, to correct this, please repost an RC2 without rerunning the build, but >> having the artifacts for the RC come from the "checkout" (release:perform) >> spot, >> instead. >> >> -Marshall >
