I think Sungju and Nate make good points.  I mean, the release may be rough 
around the edges, but we have been running UG in Production for over 2 1/2 
years.  Same with others.  The product has hardened and stabilized 
significantly during that time.  Perhaps we would be selling ourselves short 
(and the product) by not going with 1.0.

I propose that we go with 1.0 as Nate and Sungju suggest.




-- 
Rod Simpson
@rockerston
rodsimpson.com

On August 22, 2014 at 4:50:46 AM, Dave ([email protected]) wrote:

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Sungju Jin <[email protected]>  
wrote:  

> Hey guys,  
> I'm confused release version. What's correct version 0.0.29 or 1.0?  
>  

The version can be anything that we as a community want it to be. I picked  
0.0.29 because it is the current version of the stack. Also, note that the  
the release contains SDKs and each of them has its own version number as  
well, I did not change any of those.  

Personally, I think 0.0.29 is an appropriate version number for this  
release because the release is pretty rough and imperfect. It is just a  
tar-ball of our source code. There is no installer, there is no user guide  
or install guide -- except for the various README files in the source.  

In future releases, we may want to package things quite differently.  
Perhaps we should have a nice installer and a user guide. Perhaps we should  
have separate releases for SDKs, each with its own release version number.  
Those are things we should discuss here on the mailing list.  

- Dave  



2014-08-22 11:51 GMT+09:00 Rod Simpson <[email protected]>:  
> Dave,  
>  
> This is awesome! This is what has been done so far:  
>  
> [DONE] 1. remaining PRs must be acked (that are relevant to this process)  
> [DONE] 2. release must be tagged  
> [DONE] 3. verify that checksums and php signatures are valid  
> [DONE] 4. make sure release follows branding guidelines  
> [WORKING] 5. document this process in a wiki page  
> [DONE] 6. put the release files and pgp signatures here:  
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/usergrid  
> [PENDING] 7. call for a vote on the release  
>  
> I am also doing this:  
> 8. Add release info page to Usergrid incubating website.  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> --  
> Rod Simpson  
> @rockerston  
> rodsimpson.com  
>  
> On August 21, 2014 at 5:39:07 PM, Dave ([email protected]) wrote:  
>  
> There was a small problem with the upload. I should have the files in  
place  
> in the next 30 minutes.  
>  
> - Dave  
>  
>  
>  
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote:  
>  
> > Working in the master branch I have changed the version number of the  
> > stack to 0.0.29, added a Maven assembly to create the source release and  
> a  
> > script to sign the release files.  
> >  
> > A first release candidate of Apache Usergrid 0.0.29 (incubating) is  
> > available here and signed by me, along with the signature files:  
> >  
> > http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/usergrid/  
> >  
> > I also tagged master with "0.0.29rc1"  
> >  
> > Mentors (and others): anything else we need to do before calling for a  
> > vote?  
> >  
> > Thanks,  
> > - Dave  
> >  
> >  
>  



--  
Sungju Jin  
- Hacker, Apache Usergrid Committer, OSCON Speaker  
- Twitter : http://twitter.com/geekbeast  
- Blog : http://softwaregeeks.org  

Reply via email to