On Nov 16, 2007 1:00 PM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Antonio Petrelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >2007/11/16, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> hmm.  do you think this is something worth re-rolling the release?
>
> >It's really annoying for maven-based software (like Struts 2) that use
> >Velocity Tools.
> >In Struts 2 it was necessary to exclude the servlet-api 2.3 to make it work.
> >And it is wrong: it has to be "provided" since it is usually provided
> >by containers.
>
> ^it has to be^it should be
>
> apart from that, I fully agree. The dependency should be 'provided'.
>
> Nathan: I am actually -1 to releasing with "compile" dependency for
> the servlet api. Antonio is right here.

ok, here we go again...

> BTW: You can put out the RCs for consideration in your home directory
> without formal CfV. We only need a CfV if that stuff goes into an
> "official" repository or location.

i know; that's been the hope with each CfV.

>     Best regards
>          Henning
>
> --
> Henning P. Schmiedehausen  -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux,
> 91054 Buckenhof, Germany   -- +49 9131 506540  | Apache person
> Open Source Consulting, Development, Design    | Velocity - Turbine guy
>
> INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH - RG Fuerth, HRB 7350
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buckenhof. Geschaeftsfuehrer: Henning Schmiedehausen
>
>            "...it's good to be a lunatic..." -- 10th doctor
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to