Le vendredi 16 novembre 2007 à 15:30 -0800, Will Glass-Husain a écrit : > I really don't mind voting multiple times if it keeps the quality up.
Yes, but I'm not totally sure a change in a readme is always worth a new vote. > As long as that's true for at least 3 PMC member's we are ok :-) > > One lesson is that we should all really check stuff, not just vote +1. (The > more eyes the better). You can always vote +0 if you don't have time to > fully check. (I think I said explicitly don't vote +1 unless you check the > build last time I I called for a vote). I agree - and this time I thought of something I didn't check last time: the groupId must be set to velocity in the pom.xml. Remember http://velocity.markmail.org/message/uxk5qzd4nlhls7jt?q=groupid +from:%22Claude+Brisson%22 ? My fault, I should definitely have opened a JIRA entry. I think the correct groupId for all velocity subprojects is org.apache.velocity So, hum, -1 for this one, and +1 for the next one :-) Claude > Since Nathan's doing the bulk of the work on getting this out, the rest of > the PMC (and community at large) acting as QA is the least we can do. > > Best, WILL > > > > > On Nov 16, 2007 1:09 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Just give us a few hours/days to try it out before CfV. This avoids > > having to stop CfVs. :-) > > > > Best regards > > Henning > > > > Nathan Bubna schrieb: > > > On Nov 16, 2007 1:00 PM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > >> "Antonio Petrelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> > > >>> 2007/11/16, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >>>> hmm. do you think this is something worth re-rolling the release? > > >>> It's really annoying for maven-based software (like Struts 2) that use > > >>> Velocity Tools. > > >>> In Struts 2 it was necessary to exclude the servlet-api 2.3 to make it > > work. > > >>> And it is wrong: it has to be "provided" since it is usually provided > > >>> by containers. > > >> ^it has to be^it should be > > >> > > >> apart from that, I fully agree. The dependency should be 'provided'. > > >> > > >> Nathan: I am actually -1 to releasing with "compile" dependency for > > >> the servlet api. Antonio is right here. > > > > > > ok, here we go again... > > > > > >> BTW: You can put out the RCs for consideration in your home directory > > >> without formal CfV. We only need a CfV if that stuff goes into an > > >> "official" repository or location. > > > > > > i know; that's been the hope with each CfV. > > > > > >> Best regards > > >> Henning > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux, > > >> 91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person > > >> Open Source Consulting, Development, Design | Velocity - Turbine guy > > >> > > >> INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH - RG Fuerth, HRB 7350 > > >> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buckenhof. Geschaeftsfuehrer: Henning > > Schmiedehausen > > >> > > >> "...it's good to be a lunatic..." -- 10th doctor > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> > > > > -- > > Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux > > 91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person > > Open Source Consulting, Development, Design | Velocity - Turbine > > > > "Save the cheerleader. Save the world." > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
