Yes, I use Velocity 1.3.1 and SLF4J, so I know how to make it all work together but I have a whole lot of bridges and adaptors installed. :) I'd prefer that we standardize on SLF4J if we're switching away from log4j. It's easier for end-users.
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Antonio Petrelli <antonio.petre...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2015-05-29 17:21 GMT+02:00 Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com>: > >> I am also interested in SLF4J support (sorry, Chris, but if you're >> going to propose switching to commons-logging, you might as well go >> with SLF4J: http://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#why_new_project) and my long >> term goals include getting MyFaces and Cayenne to switch to slf4j. >> But it's not a priority. >> > > In theory, Velocity 2.0 has support for SLF4J: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/velocity/engine/trunk/velocity-engine-slf4j/ > > Moreover, remember that you can use jcl-over-slf4j to mimic commons-logging > while redirecting commons-logging messages to slf4j. > > Antonio --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org
