Chris, Read the whole thread. My understanding is that serialization of static commons-logging was the original problem needing fixed. slf4j doesn't have that issue.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > Claude, > > On 8/20/15 3:12 PM, Claude Brisson wrote: >> Yes, we should be using Velocity logging facade, but I just don't see >> for now how we should do this while preserving tools serialization. > > A little late to the (logging) party, and this may be a bit off-topic, > but why bother using a Velocity-specific Logging facade when > commons-logging was built for that purpose and it is already pluggable? > > Frederic Brier posted earlier in the summer about /removing/ > commons-logging, so there's obviously some contention on how this all > ought to be done. > > -chris > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org
