Hi Louis, *,

On Nov 22, 2007 7:21 PM, Louis Suarez-Potts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-11-22, at 06:03 , Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> > On Nov 20, 2007 8:24 PM, Louis Suarez-Potts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...]
> > Personally I think the one from RJ Gilson better fits in the short-
> > term, since
> > it will not cause such an abrupt difference between new frontpage and
> > the rest of the site.
>
> But what is wrong with disjunction? ;-)

One of the major issue criticized is that the site looks old. Having a
super-fancy
frontpage will make look the rest of the site even older, more dated.

A less heavy landing page doesn't make that so drastic and allows
to use that more fancy stuff for the more marketing related parts of the site
(like about/why and Download)

> I think we can finesse that by
> emphasizing the OOo logo identity instead of the images that Filip has
> chosen.

Well, the images are the key to Filips design. Replacing it with default
OOo logo-style images will greatly diminish the effect.

> > So I'd favor a design like that for the frontpage, and would go for
> > a more
> > designish one for the download or about pages, not the opposite way...
>
> I would certainly want something simple and with the points you
> cite... but do think more work is required.

Sure more work is required, but since you cannot change all of the site
from one day to another, I prefer smaller steps.

Filips design breaks with the branding, it removes banner, tabs, footer.
I doubt that it will still look convincing with these elements preserved.
Whereas the other proposal fits very well in the overall framework.

While I personally have no problem when the marketing or download pages
break with the overall look, I'd prefer if the majority of the site can be seen
as a unit, as one thing. But of course I will support either design when a
decision was made..

ciao
Christian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to