Marcus Lange wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
> 
> Hello Kay,
> 
>> First, please ignore the post I sent just now, the approach I talked
>> about won't work for the home page, but we may want to think about
>> what to do with some of the much older version, e.g. 2.4.1. I don't
>> even think they're linked right now. OK, on to this post.
> 
> latest with the coming 3.1 the older 2.x versions are just maintainance
> releases. They are available and can be reached/downloaded and thats it.
> 
> My opinion is that we shouldn't put much effort into this.

OK

> 
>> Marcus Lange wrote:
>>> Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>> Marcus Lange wrote:
>>>>> Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Kay,
>>>
>>>>> IMHO there shouldn't be any problems when:
>>>>>
>>>>> a) putting the other variables in it.
>>>>> b) move the file to download.openoffice.org
>>>>> a) renaming VERSION into STABLE_VERSION and modifying the other
>>>>> HTML websites respectively.
>>>>
>>>> Again, OK, but I think this difference would apply only to folks
>>>> wanting  to download development versions, and I'm not sure if this
>>>> would come into play with our normal download.
>>>
>>> I would like to have the renaming to identify for what the variable
>>> is when we have a lot more in the future.
>>
>> OK, I did just add several "versions" and other variables you spoke
>> about to globalvars.js which is now in the download area if you want
>> to take a look. Or, if you want to try to use them.
> 
> The globalvars.js is in your playground, right? Can you please add the
> file to the root directory of "download.openoffice.org"? Then I can test
> this with the "download.openoffice.org/test" websites.

It's in the download directory now. I only implemented it in the link
for 2.4.2. If you bring up download.openoffice.org/2.4.2, you'll see
what I mean.

Code is accessed by download.openoffice.org/globalvars.js

>>
>> I can change the index page of say download.openoffice.org/2.4.2 to
>> use the new js file for a rather non-harmful test. My only concern IS
>> that each of these old index pages will need to be manually changed
>> when we go to newer versions. I don't like this really, but can't come
>> up with a working alternative at the moment.
> 
> Yes, I know that some annoying changes are coming to us but I don't see
> an alternative, too. ;-(
> 
> BTW, to create the "next" website was also a reason to get rid of the
> many 680er links that are wide spreaded all over the OOo websites. Now
> we have to go all the other websites and do a find & replace, starting
> with "download.openoffice.org/index.html" ...

OK
> 
> Thanks for your help.
> 
> Best regards

same to you...let me know what you think. I'm happy to help out if I can
> 
> Marcus
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"There's more than one way to do it."
             -- Perl programming language motto :)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to