Yeah , in most case, we'll add more custom information such as cookie or just send post request downloading bundle js code using renderWithRequest,
certainly, this can be finished by developers own, this can be more convenient by providing this interface, so developers don't care about much more details about session/connection(iOS) callback ,saving data and so on. 2017-11-30 20:25 GMT+08:00 杨 劭君 <shaojun.y...@outlook.com>: > If I want to send post request, renderWithRequest is the best option. > > 在 2017/11/30 20:09，“misakuo”<misa...@apache.org> 写入: > > We already have the HttpAdapter abstract in native, why is not do > customize > in here? > In fact, the request is not always bound to the WXSDKInstance > 2017-11-30 19:55 GMT+08:00 杨 劭君 <shaojun.y...@outlook.com>: > > > +1, customize request header is useful > > > > 在 2017/11/30 17:19，“Adam Feng”<cxfe...@gmail.com> 写入: > > > > +1， adding custom header (such as cookie) to request is useful， > it > > should be supported both on iOS and Android. > > > > Thanks. > > Adam Feng > > > > On 30 Nov 2017, 5:16 PM +0800, xing zhang < > zhangxing610...@gmail.com>, > > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > According to my observation, you can specify a URL or js > content to > > > render a page, for URL , then WeexSDK build a request for > download > > the > > > resource and pour into the engine to > > > > > > render. But in most case, we need customize a request for > > downloading a > > > resource, and we can setup our request userAgent and headers, > our > > server > > > can receive these header to > > > > > > customize response for a request from a device. > > > > > > As for this we can expose a `renderWithRequest` interface for > > > WXSDKInstance, is this way convenient ? > > > > > > comments? please > > > > > > > > >
