OK ,this subject is held temporarily, we will try not to make developer confused about so much render interface, Weex is still flexible and extendable, and developers can control it.
thank you for the discussion about it. 2017-11-30 21:42 GMT+08:00 陈泽峰 <chenzef...@ymt360.com>: > I agree that it's a wide range of demand, and renderWithRequest is > convenient for developers facing such case. > But there are alternatives, and some of them may be more 'convenient' > .Still in my practice,I preload jsbundles when my app starts, that is to > say, download is separated from render, so I could not use it even there is > a renderWithRequest() method. > What i'm saying is, specific businesses may be far different from each > others. We could never make everyone 'convenient'.Weex is flexible and > extendable, that is the power of weex. > > > ------------------ Original ------------------ > From: "xing zhang"<zhangxing610...@gmail.com>; > Date: Thu, Nov 30, 2017 08:39 PM > To: "Weex问题列表"<dev@weex.incubator.apache.org>; > > Subject: Re: customize request when download bundle js in weex > > > Yeah , in most case, we'll add more custom information such as cookie or > just send post request downloading bundle js code using renderWithRequest, > > certainly, this can be finished by developers own, this can be more > convenient by providing this interface, so developers don't > > care about much more details about session/connection(iOS) callback ,saving > data and so on. > > > > 2017-11-30 20:25 GMT+08:00 杨 劭君 <shaojun.y...@outlook.com>: > > > If I want to send post request, renderWithRequest is the best option. > > > > 在 2017/11/30 20:09，“misakuo”<misa...@apache.org> 写入: > > > > We already have the HttpAdapter abstract in native, why is not do > > customize > > in here? > > In fact, the request is not always bound to the WXSDKInstance > > 2017-11-30 19:55 GMT+08:00 杨 劭君 <shaojun.y...@outlook.com>: > > > > > +1, customize request header is useful > > > > > > 在 2017/11/30 17:19，“Adam Feng”<cxfe...@gmail.com> 写入: > > > > > > +1， adding custom header (such as cookie) to request is useful， > > it > > > should be supported both on iOS and Android. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > Adam Feng > > > > > > On 30 Nov 2017, 5:16 PM +0800, xing zhang < > > zhangxing610...@gmail.com>, > > > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > According to my observation, you can specify a URL or js > > content to > > > > render a page, for URL , then WeexSDK build a request for > > download > > > the > > > > resource and pour into the engine to > > > > > > > > render. But in most case, we need customize a request for > > > downloading a > > > > resource, and we can setup our request userAgent and headers, > > our > > > server > > > > can receive these header to > > > > > > > > customize response for a request from a device. > > > > > > > > As for this we can expose a `renderWithRequest` interface for > > > > WXSDKInstance, is this way convenient ? > > > > > > > > comments? please > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
