On 29 February 2016 at 21:56, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:40 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 29 February 2016 at 21:37, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Main page lists a link for: >>> >>> https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/podlings/by-age >>> >>> This lists 50 PPMCs >>> >>> https://whimsy.apache.org/roster lists > > How did you get to this page?
I typed it in, because it's not linked from the main page. Perhaps it should be added above the list of its sub-pages? > It should have a trailing slash. Do we > need to add the following to > infrastructure-puppet/data/nodes/whimsy-vm2.apache.org.yaml > > RedirectMatch ^/roster$ /roster/ Probably not. >>> 51 Podlings Active podlings at the ASF => >>> https://whimsy.apache.org/podlings => 404 >>> >>> Not sure where the link is supposed to go >> >> Found it at >> >> https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/podlings >> >> However this repeats the information in, and indeed links to, >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/#current > > Apparently not. One has 50 and one has 51. :-) > >> Not sure why there is a need for this duplication. >> Why not just link to the incubator site? > > I do link to the incubator site when you click on an individual podling. > > The index pages has counts, and can sort in various ways by clicking > on the headings. Did not realise that; it's not immediately obvious. I think the Status column should be between the Name and Description (and IMO they would be more obvious if they were capitalised). > I'm not sure what cross-checks may be useful, but an > example where cross-checks find authorizations associated with retired > podlings can be found on the groups page. Current podlings may have a non-LDAP group (for SVN auth); this should disappear when the podling graduates (it's replaced by an LDAP committee group) or retires (it should be removed). >>> or why the pages disagree on >>> the number of podlings > > Nope. I would have thought that the two pages were derived from the > same data source. They should both be derived from podlings.xml, but maybe they interpret it differently. Or maybe they are using different copies - there's the original SVN, then maybe a staging copy and the deployed copy. If a change has not been fully pushed there could be discrepancies. > - Sam Ruby
