On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Craig Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com>
> wrote:
>>...
>
>> P.S. I think that infra should be authorized to access
>> https://whimsy.apache.org/secretary/public-names
>
> That is up to the Whimsy PMC, as I see things.
>
> To clarify: Whimsy is not an official service provided by Infra. We have
> not assigned an SLA to it. It runs on a project VM, and Infra has provided
> some minimal support to its operation. This can change, but that's a
> separate discussion.
>
> So it could certainly be helpful for Infra to have access to that area (and
> maybe others), I don't believe Infra is in the position to make that
> decision.

Greg is correct; but it is a very reasonable request.  The relevant
part of the configuration is here:

https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/6a6c9f01a33cd10f1e36482d3b9c6a4bb4c73fbf/data/nodes/whimsy-vm3.apache.org.yaml#L163

The simplest solution would be to add people who already have root
authority anyway to the asf-secretary ldap group, much like we already
do to the members group.  Incidentally, that IS a decision that the
Infra team can chose to make, but should chose to do so in
consultation with the ASF Secretary, not the Whimsy PMC.

> Cheers,
> Greg Stein
> Infrastructure Administrator, ASF

- Sam Ruby

Reply via email to