Thanks a lot
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
http://wicketstuff.org/jira/browse/WSJQUERY
-igor
On 8/16/07, David Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I imported the 3 project under svn.
wicketstuff-parent
wicketstuff-jquery
wicketstuff-jquery-examples
my jira account : dwayneb
Thx
/david
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
its easier if you just check this stuff in and we can make changes
directly
in svn if need be. also register a jira account and let us know what it
is
and we will create the appropriate projects/permissions.
-igor
On 8/16/07, David Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* I changed the license to ASL 2.0.
* I used org.wicketstuff.jquery as groupId for wicketstuff-jquery and
wicketstuff-jquery-examples (previously demo, renamed to follow
existing
projects)
* I create a org.wicketstuff:wicketstuff-parent project from where the
2
others project inherit
* I attach the 3 pom.xml for approbation before importing projects
Is it OK ?
/David
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On 8/16/07, David Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
my sf.net id : dwayneb
You're in.
license of jquery and other js plugins are dual GPL/MIT, ASL, or LGPL
so I don't think there is a possible inclusion into Wicket but for my
part
I'll change to ASL.
jquery is dual licensed, and the MIT license is compatible with the
ASL. So I don't see a problem with that (MIT/X11 is a category A
license, i.e. source level compatible [1]).
You suggest to use org.wicketstuff.something for groupId but the
project I saw (dojo, animator) use org.wicketstuff is it normal ?
I don't mind using org.wicketstuff. It is just that if you make more
subprojects, it is easier to detect them in the repo. Basically it is
just a suggestion. If you want to make it org.jquery.wicket, I would
ask why and possibly to reconsider, but not object.
Martijn
[1] http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
