Yes I think we use it the same way. But hopefully without setting the "Resolution" and "Status". If you plan to fix it for a specific version the status shouldn't be resolved or fixed and the resolution shouldn't be != fixed.
IMHO, Frank On 11/4/07, David Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In my previous job, we used JIRA's "fix version" to plan "for wich > version" issue must be done. Because "fix version" is used to define the > roadmap in JIRA. > Mey be it's the same case here: a workaround. > > /david > > Frank Bille wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > I'm about to write the release notes and looking through the issues with > fix > > version RC1 I see some issues with a status other that "Fixed"[1]. I > don't > > think it makes much sense to set a fix version for something that is > > "invalid" or "won't fix". > > > > WDYT? > > > > Frank > > > > [1]: http://tinyurl.com/288k7s > > >
