heh. brian (breadbox below) and i went to college together. besides his brainfuck page, brian also has written significant programs in "Intercal". i double dare you all to google that up. it makes my brain hurt just to think about it.
Stefan Lindner wrote: > > Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote: > >>Argh! I like java and I like wicket, what boundarys are you guys > reaching that java cant solve? And I then the future in short will be > all about alternative languages in jvm, like jruby scala python etc. Why > not keep it safe a little longer, but I guess it does not matter if its > totally compatible with regular java (only thing that could be annoying > is when looking at the source). > > I think the final target for Wicket 5.0 is brainfuck > (http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/bf/). The Scala implementatioin is > just a step towards Brainfuck. But remember: just wicket itself will be > written in Scala and because Scala is fully compatible with Java, you > can continue to write your code with Java. You just jave to ensure that > your Apllication server (Tomcat, Weblogic, etc.) supports Scala. > > Keep on Wicket! > > Stefan > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/planning-for-Wicket-3.0-tp16430664p16924829.html Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
