Thanks. You just gave me a headache... -Matej
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > heh. brian (breadbox below) and i went to college together. besides his > brainfuck page, brian also has written significant programs in "Intercal". > i double dare you all to google that up. it makes my brain hurt just to > think about it. > > > > > Stefan Lindner wrote: > > > > Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote: > > > >>Argh! I like java and I like wicket, what boundarys are you guys > > reaching that java cant solve? And I then the future in short will be > > all about alternative languages in jvm, like jruby scala python etc. Why > > not keep it safe a little longer, but I guess it does not matter if its > > totally compatible with regular java (only thing that could be annoying > > is when looking at the source). > > > > I think the final target for Wicket 5.0 is brainfuck > > (http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/bf/). The Scala implementatioin is > > just a step towards Brainfuck. But remember: just wicket itself will be > > written in Scala and because Scala is fully compatible with Java, you > > can continue to write your code with Java. You just jave to ensure that > > your Apllication server (Tomcat, Weblogic, etc.) supports Scala. > > > > Keep on Wicket! > > > > Stefan > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/planning-for-Wicket-3.0-tp16430664p16924829.html > > > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Resizable and reorderable grid components. http://www.inmethod.com
