It does kind of work, If you use that class on my blog and dont have references to pages inside all other pages then things will probably be fine, assuming that the httpsessionstore doesn't cause you any problems. Our site is currently running at ~4500 active clustered sessions : )
Having said that I am making progress with the new session store and will probably have a tested version by the end of the week, depending on how busy I am. Richard John Patterson wrote: > > That would be bloody brilliant! I am planning on using TC and Wicket very > soon but assumed the integration was already working. This work will save > me a lot of pain. > > > Ari Zilka wrote: >> >> Ok, >> >> a more productive response. Shall Richard and I bundle up Matej's >> proposed updates to Richard's patch and contribute it back? How do I >> go about contributing to Wicket? >> >> Thanks, >> >> --Ari >> >> On Jun 30, 2008, at 3:05 AM, richardwilko wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> Matej Knopp-2 wrote: >>>> >>>> What might be worth thinking of would be a terracotta based page >>>> store >>>> (extending AbstractPageStore - class that implements the >>>> (de)serialization magic). But even so it would still be necessary to >>>> cluster http session. >>>> >>> >>> Thats what kind of what I was thinking, and if we store this >>> TerracottaPageStore in the httpsession, rather than on disk a la >>> DiskPageStore, then we can just use terracotta to distribute the >>> httpsession >>> as normal and everything *should* work >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/Terracotta-integration-tp18168616p18192381.html >>> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Terracotta-integration-tp18168616p18199787.html Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
