Hi Eelco,

> towards you, but if they were, I guess that's the danger of being the
> messenger ;-)

yeah the messenger... damn job :P

I mean, I also dont think the rection on theserverside was a good choice. Honestly, even the writers didnt know wicket well enough to things like crypted URLs they still picked it as nearly the most secure one... *that* was quite impressive to me! (sounds to me: "well, I dont know about its special security features but even the basics seems more secure than the rest")

Best,

Korbinian




Eelco Hillenius schrieb:
its *not* my opinion - I just read the article and thought you might want to
know about it. I mean, beside that, it seems as wicket is very secure in
comparision to the other frameworks mentioned there - Honestly, I dont know
why this harsh reactions (other mails) came.

Thanks for sharing. I didn't get the impression that people were harsh
towards you, but if they were, I guess that's the danger of being the
messenger ;-)

Eelco

Reply via email to