Hi Eelco,
> towards you, but if they were, I guess that's the danger of being the
> messenger ;-)
yeah the messenger... damn job :P
I mean, I also dont think the rection on theserverside was a good
choice. Honestly, even the writers didnt know wicket well enough to
things like crypted URLs they still picked it as nearly the most secure
one... *that* was quite impressive to me! (sounds to me: "well, I dont
know about its special security features but even the basics seems more
secure than the rest")
Best,
Korbinian
Eelco Hillenius schrieb:
its *not* my opinion - I just read the article and thought you might want to
know about it. I mean, beside that, it seems as wicket is very secure in
comparision to the other frameworks mentioned there - Honestly, I dont know
why this harsh reactions (other mails) came.
Thanks for sharing. I didn't get the impression that people were harsh
towards you, but if they were, I guess that's the danger of being the
messenger ;-)
Eelco