i guess let us know when they actually have the source we can checkout to see the sample app.
-igor On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:23 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, I was just giving a heads-up to you folks (I think Martijn is on > the Incubator General list, though) in case you would be interested. > I don't know if you folks want to wait until after they leave the > incubator or if you want to jump on it during incubation. I'd be > willing to help out with writing the Wicket Olio implementation. > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> have they entered the incubator already? >> >> -igor >> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:12 AM, James Carman >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> There's a project called Olio attempting to enter incubation here at >>> Apache (some of you may already know). From the proposal: >>> >>> "Olio defines an example web 2.0 application (the initial >>> implementation uses an events site somewhat like yahoo.com/upcoming) >>> and provides three implementations: PHP, Java EE, and Ruby on Rails. >>> The toolkit will also define ways to drive load against the >>> application in order to measure performance. >>> >>> As developers join the project, they can implement the same >>> application using their favorite web frameworks and compare their >>> implementations to others." >>> >>> Perhaps there should be some Wicket representation? It'd be great to >>> see how Wicket stands up against some of the other technologies out >>> there. >>> >>> James >>> >> >
