I probably should have included this in the original email. Here's the proposal:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OlioProposal I would assume it includes db access, since Craig Russell (a JDO guy) is the one proposing it. Also, they're using RoR for one of the implementations. On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i wouldnt mind writing the olio integration also, it will probably be > a good example of a full featured wicket app. does their sample app > include db access? > > -igor > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:23 AM, James Carman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No, I was just giving a heads-up to you folks (I think Martijn is on >> the Incubator General list, though) in case you would be interested. >> I don't know if you folks want to wait until after they leave the >> incubator or if you want to jump on it during incubation. I'd be >> willing to help out with writing the Wicket Olio implementation. >> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> have they entered the incubator already? >>> >>> -igor >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:12 AM, James Carman >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> All, >>>> >>>> There's a project called Olio attempting to enter incubation here at >>>> Apache (some of you may already know). From the proposal: >>>> >>>> "Olio defines an example web 2.0 application (the initial >>>> implementation uses an events site somewhat like yahoo.com/upcoming) >>>> and provides three implementations: PHP, Java EE, and Ruby on Rails. >>>> The toolkit will also define ways to drive load against the >>>> application in order to measure performance. >>>> >>>> As developers join the project, they can implement the same >>>> application using their favorite web frameworks and compare their >>>> implementations to others." >>>> >>>> Perhaps there should be some Wicket representation? It'd be great to >>>> see how Wicket stands up against some of the other technologies out >>>> there. >>>> >>>> James >>>> >>> >> >
