Patch attached.. 

Alex Objelean


Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote:
> 
> Provide a patch and it is much more likely to be included.
> 
> Igor, do you see a problem with including it in rc5 now that you saw
> the additional information?
> 
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Alex Objelean <alex_objel...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> You're right, forgot about this option :).... So, if it will not be
>> included
>> in rc5, I will use a decorator as a workaround. Still, I hope it will be
>> included :)
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Alex Objelean
>>
>>
>> igor.vaynberg wrote:
>>>
>>>> Your suggestion, to override the WebRequestCodingStrategy isn't an
>>>> option,
>>>> just because WebRequestCodingStrategy#decode(Request) method is final.
>>>
>>> sure it is, webrequestcodingstrategy is an interface, if you cant
>>> subclass then decorate.
>>>
>>> -igor
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you!
>>>> Alex Objelean
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> igor.vaynberg wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> we should not fix this in 1.4, and there is already a jira for this in
>>>>> 1.5. we should not fix it in 1.4 because there are existing production
>>>>> sites that may depend on the current behavior and we should try not to
>>>>> break them. the problem with this version is that due to various
>>>>> reasons it got dragged out for quiet a while and there were production
>>>>> sites running even on milestones because they were pretty stable. i
>>>>> think we should just finish 1.4 and move on to 1.5 where we can fix
>>>>> all these things.
>>>>>
>>>>> in the meanwhile users can always subclass the strategies, catch the
>>>>> exceptions, and redirect to 404 if this is a big problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> -igor
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Alex Objelean
>>>>> <alex_objel...@yahoo.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could it be fixed in wicket-1.4-rc5 release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> Alex Objelean
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sounds feasible to me.  Definitely add a JIRA so that it gets
>>>>>>> tracked.
>>>>>>>  A patch will get it committed even sooner.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jeremy Thomerson
>>>>>>> http://www.wickettraining.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Objelean Alex
>>>>>>> <alex.objel...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I know it may sound strange, but I have this request in my
>>>>>>>> application:  if user tweaks an url ending with "wicket:interface =
>>>>>>>> :0::::" & add some kind of characters at the end, like "? or !",
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> page must be redirected to 404 instead of InternalError page. I
>>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>>> that I can catch WicketRuntimeException & redirect always to 404,
>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>> this would hide other potential problems because
>>>>>>>> WicketRuntimeException can be caused by other types of problems.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My suggestion is to throw a more specific RuntimeException in the
>>>>>>>> WebRequestCodingStrategy.decode method, like DecodeRequestException
>>>>>>>> (subclass of WicketRuntimeException). This way, I can treat only
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> kind of problems differently.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is you oppinion?  Should I create a JIRA issue for that?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>>>> Alex Objelean
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/-RFE--WebRequestCodingStrategy.decode-tp23845496p23845588.html
>>>>>> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://www.nabble.com/-RFE--WebRequestCodingStrategy.decode-tp23845496p23845652.html
>>>> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/-RFE--WebRequestCodingStrategy.decode-tp23845496p23845789.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/-RFE--WebRequestCodingStrategy.decode-tp23845496p23847459.html
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to