im +1, unless Jeremy can tell why he believes it will hit a anti patter..
2009/11/16 Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst <
> martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > i.e. ModelType.of(....)
> >
> > I am +1 for adding these methods.
> >
>
> I'm +1 for the model-type methods, although there are so many models that
> are not final classes that it really won't save tons of code. Mainly in
> the
> *PropertyModel family.
>
>
> > We can do the same for components, although the benefit is typically
> > less, and it might even send our users down the wrong path thinking
> > they can't use the 'new' keyword.
> >
> > TextField<String> field = TextField.of("someId", PropertyModel.of(foo,
> > "property"));
> >
>
> I'm -1 on doing it for components. I think it will lead to an
> anti-pattern.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
